Traumatic wound rupture after penetrating keratoplasty inAfrica,”British

Aim—To investigate risk factors, visual outcome, and graft survival for traumatic wound rupture after penetrating kerato-plasty. Methods—A retrospective analysis of 336 patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty from 1988 to 1995. Results—19 patients (5.7%) suVered trau-matic postoperative wound rupture re-quiring surgical repair. They were younger (mean age 16.6 years, 95 % CI 13.2–20.6) and more frequently kerato-conic (p = 0.01) than other patients (mean age 28.9 years, 95 % CI 26.–31.0). Mean postoperative follow up was 37.7 (SD 22.9) months and 24.5 (18.9) months for the rupture and non-rupture patients. Mean interval between keratoplasty and rupture was 18 (21) weeks. The lens was damaged and removed in 37 % of ruptured eyes. For keratoconics, the probability of graft sur-vival at 5 years was lower (p = 0.03) in the ruptured eyes (75%) than in the non-ruptured eyes (90%). Endothelial failure was a more common (p <0.05) cause of graft opacification in ruptured grafts than in intact grafts. Of the ruptured eyes, 53% achieved a final corrected acuity of at least 6/18 and 63 % achieved at least 6/60 compared with 48 % and 71 % of the intact eyes respectively (both p>0.1). The pro-portion of keratoconic eyes which achieved at least 6/60 was lower (p = 0.02) in the ruptured eyes (67%) than the non-ruptured eyes (87%). Eyes with wound ruptures of 5 clock hours or greater were less likely (p <0.05) to achieve an acuity of 6/18 and were more likely (p <0.05) to have an associated lens injury. Conclusions—Graft rupture is relatively common in African practice, particularly in young keratoconics. Visual outcome and graft survival are not significantly worse than for other grafted eyes, but are significantly worse than for other grafted keratoconic eyes